Racketeering is one of the most complex and aggressively prosecuted criminal offenses in Utah. These cases involve allegations that an individual participated in an organized pattern of criminal activity connected to an enterprise, rather than a single isolated offense. Because racketeering charges often combine multiple alleged crimes into one sweeping prosecution, the stakes are exceptionally high.

Utah racketeering cases frequently involve lengthy investigations, financial analysis, electronic surveillance, cooperating witnesses, and allegations spanning months or even years. Prosecutors may allege that otherwise separate acts, such as fraud, theft, drug offenses, or financial crimes, are part of a coordinated criminal enterprise. Even individuals accused of limited involvement can face severe felony exposure.

If you are under investigation or facing racketeering charges in Utah, the consequences can be devastating. Convictions may result in long prison sentences, massive fines, asset forfeiture, and permanent damage to your reputation, career, and future.

Utah Racketeering Defense Attorney

If you are under investigation or have been charged with racketeering in Utah, it is critical to understand that these cases are built strategically and aggressively by prosecutors. Early legal intervention can significantly impact the outcome.

At Susanne Gustin, Attorney at Law, we have decades of experience defending clients accused of serious felony offenses throughout Utah. We understand how racketeering cases are constructed, how prosecutors attempt to link individuals to alleged enterprises, and how to dismantle weak or overbroad theories of criminal liability. Our defense strategy includes thorough investigation, expert analysis, and aggressive constitutional challenges.

If you are facing allegations in Salt Lake County, Davis County, Utah County, or anywhere in Utah, call us for a confidential consultation. Do not speak to investigators or cooperate in any inquiry before contacting an attorney who can protect your legal interests.


Information Center


Back to Top

Definition of Racketeering Under Utah Law

Racketeering in Utah is governed by the Utah Pattern of Unlawful Activity Act, codified at Utah Code § 76-10-1601 through § 76-10-1609. A person may be charged with racketeering if they participate in an enterprise through a pattern of unlawful activity.

A “pattern of unlawful activity” generally requires:

  • At least two or more related criminal acts
  • Acts occurring within a specified time period
  • Criminal conduct connected to an enterprise

The prosecution must prove that the defendant knowingly participated in or conducted the affairs of the enterprise through these unlawful acts.


Back to Top

What Qualifies as an Enterprise

Under Utah law, an enterprise may include:

  • Businesses or corporations
  • Partnerships or associations
  • Informal groups or networks
  • Criminal organizations or alleged conspiracies

An enterprise does not need to be a formal or legitimate business. Prosecutors often argue that loosely connected individuals constitute an enterprise, which is frequently challenged by the defense.


Back to Top

Common Predicate Crimes in Utah Racketeering Cases

Racketeering charges are based on alleged “predicate offenses,” which may include:

  • Fraud and financial crimes
  • Theft or stolen property offenses
  • Drug distribution or trafficking
  • Forgery or identity theft
  • Bribery or corruption offenses
  • Money laundering
  • Extortion or coercion
  • Cybercrimes

The prosecution must prove that these acts were related and part of an ongoing criminal scheme.


Back to Top

Penalties for Racketeering in Utah

Racketeering is typically charged as a second-degree felony, though penalties may increase depending on circumstances.

Racketeering (Second-Degree Felony)

Potential penalties include:

  • 1 to 15 years in Utah state prison
  • Fines up to $10,000
  • Mandatory restitution
  • Permanent felony criminal record

Additional Consequences

Beyond incarceration and fines, racketeering convictions may result in:

  • Asset forfeiture and seizure of property
  • Freezing of bank accounts
  • Loss of professional licenses
  • Civil lawsuits by alleged victims
  • Immigration consequences for non-citizens

Because racketeering cases often involve financial allegations, the collateral consequences can be financially devastating.


Back to Top

Defenses to Racketeering Charges

  • No enterprise existed: Racketeering requires proof of an enterprise separate from the alleged criminal acts. Prosecutors often stretch this definition to include informal or loosely connected individuals. Defense counsel challenges whether an enterprise actually existed under the law.
  • No pattern of unlawful activity: Isolated or unrelated acts do not establish a pattern. The alleged predicate offenses must be related and continuous. Defense attorneys scrutinize timelines and factual connections to show the absence of a qualifying pattern.
  • Lack of knowing participation; A defendant must knowingly participate in the enterprise’s unlawful activities. Mere association, employment, or proximity to others committing crimes is not enough. Defense counsel focuses on intent, awareness, and actual involvement.
  • Predicate offenses not proven; If the underlying crimes fail, the racketeering charge collapses. Defense attorneys aggressively challenge each alleged predicate offense. Weak foundations often undermine the entire case.
  • Overbroad conspiracy allegations; Prosecutors frequently attempt to sweep multiple individuals into a single conspiracy. Defense counsel works to sever cases and limit liability. Individual conduct must be evaluated separately.
  • Unlawful searches, wiretaps, or seizures; Racketeering cases often rely on surveillance and financial records. If evidence was obtained through unconstitutional methods, it may be suppressed. Suppression can cripple the prosecution’s case.

Back to Top

Role of a Utah Racketeering Defense Attorney

  • Dissecting the prosecution’s enterprise theory; A defense attorney carefully analyzes how prosecutors define the alleged enterprise. Many cases rely on vague or speculative connections. Exposing these weaknesses is often key to dismissal or reduction.
  • Challenging each predicate offense individually: Racketeering cases rise or fall on the underlying crimes. Defense counsel attacks each alleged offense separately. Even eliminating one predicate act can defeat the entire charge.
  • Managing complex evidence and discovery: Racketeering cases involve massive volumes of records, recordings, and financial data. Defense attorneys organize, analyze, and contextualize this evidence. Clarity is critical to effective defense.
  • Protecting against asset forfeiture: Prosecutors often seek to seize property early in the case. Defense counsel challenges forfeiture actions and works to preserve financial stability. Early intervention is essential.
  • Negotiating strategic resolutions: Given the risk and complexity, some cases resolve through charge reductions or dismissals. Defense attorneys negotiate based on evidentiary weaknesses and proportionality concerns. Strategic negotiation can prevent devastating outcomes.
  • Trial representation in high-stakes felony cases: If a case proceeds to trial, defense counsel challenges conspiracy theories, expert testimony, and speculative inferences. Jurors must understand that association does not equal guilt. Skilled advocacy is essential.

Back to Top

Key Elements the Jury Considers

To convict, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  • An enterprise existed
  • The defendant was associated with or employed by the enterprise
  • The defendant knowingly participated in the enterprise
  • A pattern of unlawful activity occurred
  • The defendant’s conduct furthered the enterprise

Failure to prove any element requires acquittal.


Back to Top

Frequently Asked Questions

Is racketeering the same as conspiracy?
No. Racketeering requires proof of an enterprise and a pattern of criminal activity.

Can I be charged if I didn’t commit every alleged crime?
Possibly, but the state must prove knowing participation in the enterprise.

Are racketeering cases always long-term investigations?
Often yes, but even short timelines can be alleged if prosecutors claim a pattern.

Should I talk to investigators if contacted?
You should consult a criminal defense attorney before making any statements.


Back to Top

Additional Resources

Utah Code § 76-10-1601 – Definitions (Racketeering)Defines racketeering terms under Utah law.

CHAPTER 96—RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS – US Federal Law on Rackeeteering and Related Offenses


Back to Top

Finding a Racketeering Defense Attorney in Utah

Racketeering charges expose defendants to some of the harshest penalties under Utah law and often involve complex, high-pressure investigations. These cases demand immediate, experienced legal defense.

Susanne Gustin, Attorney at Law represents individuals charged with racketeering throughout Salt Lake County, Davis County, Utah County, and across the state of Utah.

If you are under investigation or facing racketeering charges, contact our office today for a confidential consultation and begin protecting your freedom, assets, and future.